Abstract

A novel artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm to detect structural damage via modal and frequency analyses is proposed (named as TCABC algorithm). Compared to the standard ABC algorithm, tabu search method and chaotic search method are adopted in the proposed algorithm to enhance the exploration and exploitation ability. The tabu search method uses a memory function to avoid the solution being trapped in a local minimum, which increases the exploitation ability. Chaotic search method generates more searching points for finding the global minimum, which increases the exploration ability. Additionally, the first roulette wheel selection is replaced by the tournament selection to enhance the global searching ability of the TCABC algorithm. Several explicit test functions and an implicit damage detection function are employed to check the numerical results obtained from ABC and TCABC algorithms. Afterward, the damage detection accuracy of the TCABC algorithm is verified under different circumstances, and several recommendations are given for using the TCABC algorithm to detect structural damages under actual conditions. Finally, an experimental study is applied to examine the performance of TCABC algorithm for damage detection. The results show the following: (1) compared to traditional ABC algorithm, TCABC algorithm performs better; (2) fewer groups lead to faster convergence as demonstrated by both algorithms used in the same damage situation; (3) TCABC algorithm can infer the locations and extents of the damage when the groupings are inaccurate; (4) the accuracy of the field test data profoundly affects the precision of the damage detection results. In other words, stronger noises result in worse identification results; (5) whether or not the noises exist, the more data are measured, the more accurate the results can be achieved; (6) the TCABC algorithm can efficiently detect structural damage in the experimental study.

Highlights

  • Early-stage damage detection is one of the main tasks in structural health monitoring [1], and this task is accomplished by fundamental damage detection method and parameter identification

  • Because the focus here is the influences of the grouping sizes, Figure 10(b) only displays the results of the TCABC algorithm under different scales of grouping; it can be observed that even though there are some noises, the damages are detected by all three dimensions of grouping

  • A novel artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm (i.e., TCABC algorithm) for structural damage detection via modal and frequency analyses is presented; two searching methods, tabu search method and chaotic search method, are adopted to enhance the exploration and exploitation ability. e tabu search method uses a memory function to avoid the solution being trapped in a local minimum, which increases the exploitation ability. e chaotic search method generates more searching points for finding the global minimum, which increases the exploration ability

Read more

Summary

A Novel Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Structural Damage Detection

Compared to the standard ABC algorithm, tabu search method and chaotic search method are adopted in the proposed algorithm to enhance the exploration and exploitation ability. Chaotic search method generates more searching points for finding the global minimum, which increases the exploration ability. E results show the following: (1) compared to traditional ABC algorithm, TCABC algorithm performs better; (2) fewer groups lead to faster convergence as demonstrated by both algorithms used in the same damage situation; (3) TCABC algorithm can infer the locations and extents of the damage when the groupings are inaccurate; (4) the accuracy of the field test data profoundly affects the precision of the damage detection results. Stronger noises result in worse identification results; (5) whether or not the noises exist, the more data are measured, the more accurate the results can be achieved; (6) the TCABC algorithm can efficiently detect structural damage in the experimental study

Introduction
Theoretical Background
Algorithms for Damage Detection
Numerical Study
Comparison of Standard ABC and TCABC Algorithms
G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12
Objective function value
G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 G7 G8 G9 G10 G11 G12 24 m
Experimental Study
Figure 14:
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.