Abstract
With the growing rate of urban population and transport congestion, it is important for a city to have bike riding as an attractive travel choice but one of its biggest barriers for people is the perceived lack of safety. To improve the safety of urban cycling, identification of high-risk location and routes are major obstacles for safety countermeasures. Risk assessment is performed by crash data analysis, but the lack of data makes that approach less effective when applied to cyclist safety. Furthermore, the availability of data collected with the modern technologies opens the way to different approaches. This research aim is to analyse data needs and capability to identify critical cycling safety events for urban context where bicyclist behaviour can be recorded with different equipment and bicycle used as a probe vehicle to collect data. More specifically, three different sampling frequencies have been investigated to define the minimum one able to detect and recognize hard breaking. In details, a novel signal processing procedure has been proposed to correctly deal with speed and acceleration signals. Besides common signal filtering approaches, wavelet transformation and Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) techniques have been applied to remove more efficiently the instrument noise and align the signals with respect to the reference. The Euclidean distance of the DTW has been introduced as index to get the best filter parameters configuration. Obtained results, both during the calibration and the investigated real scenario, confirm that at least a GPS signal with a sampling frequency of 1 is needed to track the rider’s behaviour to detect events. In conclusion, with a very cheap hardware setup is possible to monitor riders’ speed and acceleration.
Highlights
Cyclists represent 8% of all road deaths in the European Union with about 2000 fatalities in 2016 [1]
When GNSS receiver is used to analyse in detail biker riding analytics in detail, other than the accuracy acquisition frequency is an issue because of the lower cycling speed m/s to 7 m/s and event duration, 2 s to 4 s, compared to motorized vehicles
The results related to the previous signal processing steps are depicted in two different scenarios: the first one is a calibration test performed to tune the processing procedure, the second scenario is related to an application of the before discussed procedure in a real riding
Summary
Cyclists represent 8% of all road deaths in the European Union with about 2000 fatalities in 2016 [1]. While small in proportion with motorized vehicles, they are generally unprotected and vulnerable in traffic and, encountered in severe injuries or fatal consequences. Studies report that “the risk of a serious injury per kilometre travelled is times higher for cyclist than for car drivers” [2]. Interactions, InDev (In-Depth understanding of accident causation for Vulnerable road users) Project [5] where a review of current studies about Safety Critical Events (SCEs) involving cyclists was analysed, or the Australian project BIKEALYZE [6] where a naturalistic cycling study was performed. The identification of safety-critical events was performed via self-reporting, manual review of video footage and indicators collected via the naturalistic data. In other studies, participants had an active role to indicate any SCE they experienced via a push-button on the vehicle [7] or in a smartphone app [8]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.