Abstract
Abstract. We describe a new top boundary condition (TBC) for representing the air–soil diffusive exchange of a generic volatile tracer. This new TBC (1) accounts for the multi-phase flow of a generic tracer; (2) accounts for effects of soil temperature, pH, solubility, sorption, and desorption processes; (3) enables a smooth transition between wet and dry soil conditions; (4) is compatible with the conductance formulation for modeling air–water volatile tracer exchange; and (5) is applicable to site, regional, and global land models. Based on the new TBC, we developed new formulations for bare-soil resistance and corresponding soil evaporation efficiency. The new soil resistance is predicted as the reciprocal of the harmonic sum of two resistances: (1) gaseous and aqueous molecular diffusion and (2) liquid mass flow resulting from the hydraulic pressure gradient between the soil surface and center of the topsoil control volume. We compared the predicted soil evaporation efficiency with those from several field and laboratory soil evaporation measurements and found good agreement with the typically observed two-stage soil evaporation curves. Comparison with the soil evaporation efficiency equation of Lee and Pielke (1992; hereafter LP92) indicates that their equation can overestimate soil evaporation when the atmospheric resistance is low and underestimate soil evaporation when the soil is dry. Using a synthetic inversion experiment, we demonstrated that using inverted soil resistance data from field measurements to derive empirical soil resistance formulations resulted in large uncertainty because (1) the inverted soil resistance data are always severely impacted by measurement error and (2) the derived empirical equation is very sensitive to the number of data points and the assumed functional form of the resistance. We expect the application of our new TBC in land models will provide a consistent representation for the diffusive tracer exchange at the soil–air interface.
Highlights
Diffusive transport is one of the few pathways, besides convection and wet deposition, through which the soil exchanges volatile substances, including water vapor, with the atmosphere
We discuss the limits of using our new soil resistance formulation, measurements that could be used for further evaluation and improvement, and potential extensions to enable a new formulation of surface evaporation and generic tracer exchanges that considers both vegetated and non-vegetated soil surfaces
We developed a new top boundary condition (TBC) to model the diffusive exchange of volatile tracers at the air–soil interface
Summary
Diffusive transport (including molecular diffusion and eddy diffusion) is one of the few pathways, besides convection and wet deposition, through which the soil exchanges volatile substances (or tracers, which will be used interchangeably in this study unless stated otherwise), including water vapor, with the atmosphere. And consistently characterizing these air–soil tracer exchanges is important for models representing a wide range of biogeochemical processes, including (1) air–soil exchange of trace gases, such as CO2, CH4, N2O, NH3, HONO, and H2 (e.g., Lefer et al, 1999; Li et al, 2000; Tang et al, 2010; Riley et al, 2011; Su et al, 2011; Yashiro et al, 2011); (2) soil evaporation (e.g., Milly, 1982; Salvucci, 1997; Katata et al, 2007; Sakaguchi and Zeng, 2009); (3) water and trace gas isotope exchanges between soil surface and atmosphere (e.g., Mathieu and Bariac, 1996; Riley et al, 2002; Braud et al, 2005); (4) NOx and O3 deposition to soil (e.g., Gut et al, 2002; Kirkman et al, 2002); and (5) soil–atmosphere exchange of Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Riley: Theoretical analysis and application to soil evaporation volatile organic carbons (e.g., Goss, 1993; Ruiz et al, 1998; Insam and Seewald, 2010; Reichman et al, 2013)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have