Abstract
By a progressive and careful construction during his controversy with the Pelagians, Augustine provides Christian polemic with a new kind of argument: the citation of patristic authorities who have reached an agreement on a doctrinal question. A careful reading of the different treatises shows that Augustine is struggling to find a way to argue from patristic citation without being bound to the authority of any one of his predecessors. This is why he tries to work within the authority of a consensus of Catholic authors. This creation is more than a response to the attacks of the Pelagians and reflects that Augustine is conscious of the difficulty of claiming scriptural warrant for doctrine and of the necessity of introducing other factors into this search.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
