Abstract
Extractive distillation is a widely-used but energy-intensive method for separating homogeneous azeotropic mixtures into pure components. Numerous design alternatives have been proposed for reducing energy consumption in such processes, including alternatives with side-streams, column stacking and thermally coupled sequences. However, there is very little guidance in the literature about which alternative is likely to work the best in a given situation.To address this deficiency, in this work, seventeen industrially-relevant chemical systems comprising two species that form a minimum boiling azeotrope and a heavy entrainer are selected for study. Two ordinary and six energy-saving flowsheet alternatives for extractive distillation processes were also selected. Each of the eight flowsheet alternatives was optimized for each of the 17 chemical systems. A novel metric RCB (the ratio of the entrainer flow rate to the heavy key flow rate) is proposed to facilitate interpretation of the results. General trends in the relative attractiveness of the three energy-saving strategies (side streams, thermal coupling, column stacking heat integration) were found as RCB changes. An understanding of these trends can help engineers to understand the conditions for which various energy-savings strategies are most likely to be effective.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.