A new methodological approach to the evaluation of quality of life in postmenopausal women

Abstract

An approach employing a range of standardized questionnaires, which included the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index and the Mood Adjective Check List (MACL), was used to assess health-related quality of life (QoL) in conjunction with a study comparing two doses of transdermal oestrogen (50 or 100 μg/24 h) combined with an oral progestogen (5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for 14 days each cycle). In addition to the QoL measures, climacteric symptoms were self-rated and also summarized by means of the Kupperman index. In all, 59 women, median age 52 (39–71) years, who completed 4 months of therapy were evaluated. The use of a battery of standardized questionnaires enabled a comprehensive evaluation to be made of perceived health, well-being and day-to-day functioning. Not only was symptomatic relief, e.g. reduced frequency of sweating episodes, sleep disturbance and hot flushes, observed during treatment, but there were also improvements in terms of sleep, energy and emotions. The frequency of health-related problems associated with paid employment, housework, social life, home life and sex life decreased, indicating enhanced ability to take part in daily activities. The PGWB index showed improvement in the subscales representing well-being, anxiety, depression, vitality, health and self-control, while the mood scales indicated that the women experienced less tension and more satisfaction. Although the results of this study need to be further documented on the basis of a placebo-controlled trial, the findings nevertheless imply that the use of a battery of standardized questionnaires optimizes the possibility of evaluating climacteric complaints reliably before and after treatment.