Abstract

To characterize a poroelastic material, typically an indenter is pressed onto the surface of the material with a ramp of a finite approach velocity followed by a hold where the indenter displacement is kept constant. This leads to deformation of the porous matrix, pressurization of the interstitial fluid and relaxation due to redistribution of fluid through the pores. In most studies the poroelastic properties, including elastic modulus, Poisson ratio and poroelastic diffusion coefficient, are extracted by assuming an instantaneous step indentation. However, exerting step like indentation is not experimentally possible and usually a ramp indentation with a finite approach velocity is applied. Moreover, the poroelastic relaxation time highly depends on the approach velocity in addition to the poroelastic diffusion coefficient and the contact area. Here, we extensively studied the effect of indentation velocity using finite element simulations which has enabled the formulation of a new framework based on a master curve that incorporates the finite rise time. To verify our novel framework, the poroelastic properties of two types of hydrogels were extracted experimentally using indentation tests at both macro and micro scales. Our new framework that is based on consideration of finite approach velocity is experimentally easy to implement and provides a more accurate estimation of poroelastic properties. Statement of significanceHydrogels, tissues and living cells are constituted of a sponge-like porous elastic matrix bathed in an interstitial fluid. It has been shown that these materials behave according to the theory of ‘poroelasticity’ when mechanically stimulated in a way similar to that experienced in organs within the body. In this theory, the rate at which the fluid-filled sponge can be deformed is limited by how fast interstitial fluid can redistribute within the sponge in response to deformation. Here, we simulated indentation experiments at different rates and formulated a new framework that inherently captures the effects of stimulation speed on the mechanical response of poroelastic materials. We validated our framework by conducting experiments at different length-scales on agarose and polyacrylamide hydrogels.

Highlights

  • Due to their practical applications in biomedicine and bioengineering, substantial efforts have been made to characterize theM.H

  • (b, c, d) Force–relaxation tests consist of ramp and hold phases separated through rise time tR. (b) The indentation depth versus time for different rise times tR: in the ramp phase the indentation depth increases linearly with time until reaching a maximum depth of δM at time tR that is kept constant during hold phase. (c) The force versus time for different rise times tR: the indentation depth is kept constant during the hold phase and the maximum force FM that is achieved during ramp phase relaxes to a fully relaxed force F∞ after prolonged time

  • Considering different rise times and keeping the maximum indentation depth constant yield different approach velocities and result in different maximum forces. (d) Plots of the force against indentation depth for different tR. (e) Maximum forces FM emerged as a result of different approach velocities were plotted against the rise times tR. (f) Normalized maximum force versus normalized rise time: appropriate normalization of maximum forces and rise times lead to a master curve as proposed in this study

Read more

Summary

Statement of significance

Tissues and living cells are constituted of a sponge-like porous elastic matrix bathed in an interstitial fluid. It has been shown that these materials behave according to the theory of ‘poroelasticity’ when mechanically stimulated in a way similar to that experienced in organs within the body. In this theory, the rate at which the fluid-filled sponge can be deformed is limited by how fast interstitial fluid can redistribute within the sponge in response to deformation. We simulated indentation experiments at different rates and formulated a new framework that inherently captures the effects of stimulation speed on the mechanical response of poroelastic materials. We validated our framework by conducting experiments at different length-scales on agarose and polyacrylamide hydrogels

Introduction
The FEM method
Hydrogel preparation
Atomic force microscopy indentation
Macroscale indentation
FEM analysis: effects of approach velocity and contact size
FEM analysis
Experimental validation
Extraction of a novel master curve
Further discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call