A new failure criterion for the Gurson-Tvergaard dilational constitutive model

Abstract

In the Gurson-Tvergaard model a failure criterion has to be used to signify the void coalescence. In the literature, a constant critical void volume fraction criterion has been widely used. However, it is questionable whether the critical void volume fraction is a material constant and, furthermore, it is also difficult in practice to determine the ‘constant’. By modifying Thomason's plastic limit-load model, a new failure criterion which is fully compatible with the Gurson-Tvergaard model, is presented in this study. In the present criterion, the void coalescence failure mechanism by internal necking has been considered and the material failure is a natural result of the development of dual constitutive, stable and unstable, responses. In practical application of the present criterion, no critical void volume fraction needs to be pre-determined either numerically or experimentally. Furthermore, according to the new criterion, the void volume fraction corresponding to void coalescence is not a material constant, rather a function of stress triaxiality. The predictions using the present criterion have been compared with the finite element results by Koplik and Needleman, and very good agreement is observed. The potential advantage of this criterion and other related issues are discussed.