Abstract

Supply elasticity measures how much supply will increase when the price rises. In the housing literature, it is well known that supply elasticity is determined by geographic constraints, land-use regulations, and current land use status. Interestingly, we find that all these determinants are not sufficient to explain the neighborhood supply elasticity in Hong Kong during 2003 and 2018 using the two well-established approaches in the literature. Instead, we find that the ownership constraints (the degree of land title fragmentation) have significantly determined the supply elasticity at this very micro level. This finding can be explained by the tragedy of the anticommons, in which the title fragmentation can lead to sub-optimal use of land and decrease supply elasticity. As a continuation of Baum-Snow and Han (2019), we confirm their empirical findings that neighborhoods close to the CBD have lower supply elasticity, and we propose two underlying reasons. Our evidence rejects the homevoter hypothesis but points to again the ownership constraints. This paper contributes to the housing supply at the microgeographic level, paving the way for the growing literature of within-city heterogeneity, including the price movements and many others.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.