Abstract

The deactivation of sulfate-promoted iron oxide in the esterification of acetic acid and n-butanol was studied. The sulfate-promoted iron oxide was used ten runs and 10 h, continually and accumulatively. After ten-run continual use of the catalyst, a considerable deactivation happened to it. The fresh and the deactivated catalysts were compared by means of many characteristic methods including FTIR, XRD, BET, SEM, TG–DSC, and NH3–TPD, to disclose some possible reasons for the deactivation of sulfate-promoted iron oxide in the esterification. Based on the comparative analyses of IR patterns of the fresh catalyst and the deactivated one, a deactivation mechanism is tentatively proposed. Namely, surface sulfate groups, which are originally coordinated to Fe3+ cations and can so induce and generate strong Lewis acidity of Fe3+ cations, may have been gradually turned into free sulfate groups and sulfate esters arisen from strong Lewis-acidic Fe3+ cations’ being hydrolyzed by H2O and their being alcoholyzed by n-butanol, which leads to a gradual destruction of the originally strong coordination between Fe3+ cations and surface sulfate groups, so leading to the acidity degradation of the catalyst, and so finally leading to the deactivation of it. Emphatically, in the proposed mechanism, the water produced from the esterification may play a key role on the deactivation of the catalyst, because it can directly hydrolyze some strong Lewis-acidic Fe3+ cations of the catalyst and indirectly promote the alcoholysis of them, to form weak Lewis-acidic Fe–OH species. The deactivated catalyst has a larger crystallinity, a smaller specific surface area, a smaller sulfate groups content, a weaker acidity than the fresh. All these phenomena, accompanying the deactivation of sulfate-promoted iron oxide, can be interpreted by the proposed deactivation mechanism very well.

Highlights

  • Up to now, there are still a lot of liquid acid catalysts which are extensively used in chemical industry, which are accompanied by a lot of problems such as corrosions, pollutions and unwanted side reactions and so on

  • The fresh and the deactivated catalysts were compared by means of many characteristic methods including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), BET, scanning electron microscope (SEM), thermo gravimetric analysis (TG)–DSC, and NH3– TPD, to disclose some possible reasons for the deactivation of sulfate-promoted iron oxide in the esterification

  • Surface sulfate groups, which are originally coordinated to Fe3? cations and can so induce and generate strong Lewis acidity of Fe3? cations, may have been gradually turned into free sulfate groups and sulfate esters arisen from strong Lewis-acidic Fe3? cations’ being hydrolyzed by H2O and their being alcoholyzed by n-butanol, which leads to a gradual destruction of the originally strong coordination between Fe3? cations and surface sulfate groups, so leading to the acidity degradation of the catalyst, and so leading to the deactivation of it

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are still a lot of liquid acid catalysts which are extensively used in chemical industry, which are accompanied by a lot of problems such as corrosions, pollutions and unwanted side reactions and so on. The sulfate-promoted metal oxides have been attracting more and more attention in recent years [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] due to their unique advantages over those traditional liquid acid catalysts They are quite stable to moisture, air, and heat, and they are less corrosive to reactors and containers, and they are environmentally friendly [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Doping other aided elements to the bulks of sulfated metal oxides can retard their deactivation to some extent [15, 16] These modifying methods are not enough to solve the problem. The paper attempts to clarify some possible reasons for their deactivation in the esterification of acetic acid and n-butanol by studying the fresh and deactivated sulfate-promoted iron oxides by means of many characteristic methods

Materials
Preparations of the Catalysts
Deactivation Phenomena of Sulfate-Promoted Iron Oxide
Characterization of the Catalysts
A New Deactivation Mechanism
FT-IR Patterns of the Catalysts
C H2C CH3
Specific Surface Areas and Pore Distributions of the Catalysts
Thermal Analysis of the Catalysts
SEM Photos of the Catalysts
NH3–TPD Curves of the Catalysts
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call