Abstract
The case study shows the complex reality with respect to processes of meaning construction. Ruiter’s framework provides a more sophisticated instrument to analyse these complex processes. Unlike the classic models of legal communication, based upon a linear causality between norm and action, and unlike the dual model of interplay between legal institutions and institutional legal facts developed by MacCormick and Weinberger’s Institutional Legal Theory (ILT), the tripartite model of interplay between rule, application, and social practices, stemming from Ruiter’s analysis of ILT, can contribute to a more refined model of legal communication.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.