Abstract
In this study, we propose a new class of tests for overidentifying restrictions in moment condition models, extending Neyman’s (1959) test for parameter hypotheses in maximum likelihood to generalized empirical likelihood (GEL). These tests lack the complicated saddle point problem seen in GEL estimation; only a consistent estimator, where n is the sample size, is needed. In addition to discussing their first-order properties, we establish that under some regularity conditions, these tests share the same higher-order properties as GEL overidentifying tests, given proper consistent estimators. A Monte Carlo simulation study shows that the new class of tests of overidentifying restrictions has better finite sample performance than the two-step GMM overidentification test, and compares well to several potential alternatives in terms of overall performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
