Abstract

Wetland restoration performed as a requirement of compensatory mitigation does not always replace lost acreage or functions. Most new projects are required to identify performance standards to evaluate restoration outcomes. Current performance standards are primarily related to vegetation with little to no evaluation of wetland hydrologic regimes. Because of the agreement in the scientific literature about the role of hydrology in creating and maintaining wetland structure and function, hydrologic performance standards may be an ecologically meaningful way to evaluate restoration outcomes. This research tests the use of water level data from project specific reference sites to evaluate restored water levels for three distinct wetland types across the United States. We analyzed existing datasets from past and ongoing wetland mitigation projects to identify the number of years it took water levels in restored wetlands to match reference sites, and to test whether similar water levels between restored and reference sites leads to increased vegetation success. Wetland types differed in the number of years it took for water levels to match reference sites. Vernal pools in California took nine years to match reference sites, fens and wet meadows in Colorado took four years, and forested wetlands in the southeastern US were hydrologically similar to reference sites the first year following restoration. Plant species cover in all three restored wetland types was related to the water level similarity to reference sites. Native cover was higher when water levels were more similar to reference sites, and was lower in areas where water levels were different. Exotic species cover showed the opposite relationship in fens and wet meadows, where hydrologic similarity led to low cover of exotic species. Along with the general agreement of the importance of hydrology for wetland form and function, this research shows that hydrologic performance standards may also lead to increased vegetation success in some wetland types.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call