Abstract

In data assimilation problems, various types of data are naturally linked to different spatial resolutions (e.g. seismic and electromagnetic data), and these scales are usually not coincident to the subsurface simulation model scale. Alternatives like down/upscaling of the data and/or the simulation model can be used, but with potential loss of important information. To address this issue, a novel Multiscale (MS) data assimilation method is introduced. The overall idea of the method is to keep uncertain parameters and observed data at their original representation scale, avoiding down/upscaling of any quantity. The method relies on a recently developed mathematical framework to compute adjoint gradients via a MS strategy. The fine-scale uncertain parameters are directly updated and the MS grid is constructed in a resolution that meets the observed data resolution. The advantages of the technique are demonstrated in the assimilation of data represented at a coarser scale than the simulation model. The misfit objective function is constructed to keep the MS nature of the problem. The regularization term is represented at the simulation model (fine) scale, whereas the data misfit term is represented at the observed data (coarse) scale. The performance of the method is demonstrated in synthetic models and compared to down/upscaling strategies. The experiments show that the MS strategy provides advantages 1) on the computational side – expensive operations are only performed at the coarse scale; 2) with respect to accuracy – the matched uncertain parameter distribution is closer to the “truth”; and 3) in the optimization performance – faster convergence behaviour due to faster gradient computation. In conclusion, the newly developed method is capable of providing superior results when compared to strategies that rely on the up/downscaling of the response/observed data, addressing the scale dissimilarity via a robust, consistent MS strategy.

Highlights

  • Subsurface simulation models should be conditioned to field data, whenever possible, in order to reduce uncertainty in the model parameters and increase forecasting reliability

  • The experiment shows that the MS strategy provides several potential advantages compared to more traditional scale conciliation strategies: (1) expensive operations are only performed at the coarse scale; (2) the matched uncertain parameter distribution is closer to the “truth”; (3) faster convergence behavior occurs due to faster gradient computation; and (4) better uncertainty quantification results are obtained

  • We focus our experiments on both the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimate and uncertainty quantification (UQ) via the randomized maximum likelihood (RML) method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extended author information available on the last page of the article. order to better estimate the uncertain parameters. In [3], a multiscale inversion technique is presented based on the Markov-chain Monte Carlo method that relies on the generalized multiscale finite element method [8] Despite this body of work found in the inverse modeling literature, when one is interested in assimilating spatially distributed data, there is an implicit assumption that the observed data is described at the same scale of the parameters is usually made. The objective of this work is to develop and demonstrate an inverse modelling method that, at the same time, (1) is computationally efficient, (2) addresses the scale dissimilarity issue, with minimum loss of information, and (3) is capable of updating the highest fidelity model description To this end, we exploit multiscale (MS) simulation strategies in order to (1) speed up the forward simulation, while preserving fine-scale geological features, (2) efficiently compute gradient information, and (3) seamlessly. The real system data, can only be observed at a resolution that is coarser or equal to the resolution at which θ is described

Inverse problem as a PDE-constrained optimization
Problem statement
Multiscale simulation
The forward model
Construction of scaling operators via the MSFV method
Computational efficiency
Adjoint gradient computation
Conciliation of spatially distributed data and forward model scales
Multiscale data assimilation
Multiscale gradient computation
Scaling operators partial derivative computation
Numerical experiments
Observed data downscaling
Model response upscaling
Maximum a posteriori probability estimate
Uncertainty quantification
Discussion
Final Remarks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.