Abstract

In data assimilation problems, various types of data are naturally linked to different spatial resolutions (e.g., seismic and electromagnetic data), and these scales are usually not coincident to the subsurface simulation model scale. Alternatives like upscaling/downscaling of the data and/or the simulation model can be used, but with potential loss of important information. Such alternatives introduce additional uncertainties which are not in the nature of the problem description, but the result of the post processing of the data or the geo-model. To address this issue, a novel multiscale (MS) data assimilation method is introduced. The overall idea of the method is to keep uncertain parameters and observed data at their original representation scale, avoiding upscaling/downscaling of any quantity. The method relies on a recently developed mathematical framework to compute adjoint gradients via a MS strategy in an algebraic framework. The fine-scale uncertain parameters are directly updated and the MS grid is constructed in a resolution that meets the observed data resolution. This formulation therefore enables a consistent assimilation of data represented at a coarser scale than the simulation model. The misfit objective function is constructed to keep the MS nature of the problem. The regularization term is represented at the simulation model (fine) scale, whereas the data misfit term is represented at the observed data (coarse) scale. The computational aspects of the method are investigated in a simple synthetic model, including an elaborate uncertainty quantification step, and compared to upscaling/downscaling strategies. The experiment shows that the MS strategy provides several potential advantages compared to more traditional scale conciliation strategies: (1) expensive operations are only performed at the coarse scale; (2) the matched uncertain parameter distribution is closer to the “truth”; (3) faster convergence behavior occurs due to faster gradient computation; and (4) better uncertainty quantification results are obtained. The proof-of-concept example considered in this paper sheds new lights on how one can reduce uncertainty within fine-scale geo-model parameters with coarse-scale data, without the necessity of upscaling/downscaling the data nor the geo-model. The developments demonstrate how to consistently formulate such a gradient-based MS data assimilation strategy in an algebraic framework which allows for implementation in available computational platforms.

Highlights

  • Subsurface simulation models should be conditioned to field data, whenever possible, in order to reduce uncertainty in the model parameters and increase forecasting reliability

  • We focus our experiments on both the maximum a-posteriori (MAP) estimate and uncertainty quantification (UQ) via the randomized maximum likelihood (RML) method

  • The maximum a posteriori probability (MAP, [46]) of the uncertain parameters is obtained by solving the optimization problem stated in Eq 7, with the objective function (OF)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extended author information available on the last page of the article. order to better estimate the uncertain parameters. In [3], a multiscale inversion technique is presented based on the Markov-chain Monte Carlo method that relies on the generalized multiscale finite element method [8] Despite this body of work found in the inverse modeling literature, when one is interested in assimilating spatially distributed data, there is an implicit assumption that the observed data is described at the same scale of the parameters is usually made. The objective of this work is to develop and demonstrate an inverse modelling method that, at the same time, (1) is computationally efficient, (2) addresses the scale dissimilarity issue, with minimum loss of information, and (3) is capable of updating the highest fidelity model description To this end, we exploit multiscale (MS) simulation strategies in order to (1) speed up the forward simulation, while preserving fine-scale geological features, (2) efficiently compute gradient information, and (3) seamlessly. The real system data, can only be observed at a resolution that is coarser or equal to the resolution at which θ is described

Inverse problem as a PDE-constrained optimization
Problem statement
Multiscale simulation
The forward model
Construction of scaling operators via the MSFV method
Computational efficiency
Adjoint gradient computation
Conciliation of spatially distributed data and forward model scales
Multiscale data assimilation
Multiscale gradient computation
Scaling operators partial derivative computation
Numerical experiments
Observed data downscaling
Model response upscaling
Maximum a posteriori probability estimate
Uncertainty quantification
Discussion
Final Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call