Abstract

Interculturalism (IC) is presently discussed as a foundational basis for local public policy aimed at managing migration-related diversity within ethno-culturally plural societies, especially at the local level. Despite its increased saliency over the last decade, IC is neither theoretically new nor was it always intended for mere application in strictly city contexts of diversity. Rather, it has a global origin as a political basis for international relations and negotiations. In discussing these origins, this article has two main interrelated aims. Firstly, it provides an overview of the multi-scale approach of IC, with the purpose of disentangling analytically the different empirical bases where it can frame the diversity agenda. Secondly, it explores whether a lack of appreciation and awareness of this multi-scale orientation may affect IC’s capacity to address the challenges of diversity governance at the local level. Methodologically, the article will undertake a textual analysis of a select number of leading documents framing its practice within the broader policy literature produced by the four main institutions that have advocated the intercultural approach within a global agenda. These are the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and United Nations University, on one hand, and the European Union and the Council of Europe on the other. The main findings show us the importance of a multi-scale thinking in diversity and IC studies, to avoid contributing to greater confusion in its applications.

Highlights

  • Interculturalism (IC) is increasingly being invoked as a possible basis for policy strategies aimed at managing migration-related diversity within local ethnoculturally plural societies, especially at the local level (Cantle, 2012; Wood, 2004; Zapata-Barrero, 2017a)

  • The first purpose of this article was to review the historical emergence of IC and examine its multi-scale foundation and application, arguing that the re-direction, from global politics to local policy, needs a clear analytical distinction to avoid taking for granted arguments and theoretical paradigms related to its core assumptions

  • The main argument advanced here is that if this multi-scale application of IC involves an uncritical transfer of meanings from the global to the local agenda, it may risk contributing to greater conceptual fuzziness and policy confusion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interculturalism (IC) is increasingly being invoked as a possible basis for policy strategies aimed at managing migration-related diversity within local ethnoculturally plural societies, especially at the local level (Cantle, 2012; Wood, 2004; Zapata-Barrero, 2017a). IC has been used for interfaith dialogue and conflict resolution in ethnically and religiously divided territories and societies, for example, in the case of post-war Lebanon (Yazbeck Haddad & Fischbach, 2015), Europe (Orton, 2016) and subSaharan Africa (Omotosho, 2014) and many other similar contexts. It has even been used as a strategy for region building within a broader Euro-Mediterranean partnership (Perini, 2020; Walton, 2012). IC presupposes “cultural exchange” and, by definition is a

A Multi‐scale Approach to Interculturalism
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call