Abstract

Under the individual vessel quota regulations, the expected economic return of a multi species fishery is influenced by an array of a multi-component choice such as targeted species, landings per haul, harvesting time and its location. The components of effort allocation decisions are further complicated by changes in the market conditions and the constant movements of fish between spawning and feeding habitats. Migratory behavior influences the dispersal of species, relative availability of fish and its composition, and the bycatch likelihood across different locations over the course of a fishing year. The objective of this article is to investigate the optimal allocation of fishing effort in the Norwegian bottom-trawl fleet within economically important species; cod, saithe, and haddock across three heavily trawled areas—including southern and northern parts of the west coast of Norway, and the high sea areas of the Arctic—to achieve maximum expected economic return, with respect to the individual vessel quota constraints and bycatch considerations. The results from a mixed integer non-linear optimization problem evidence that the spawning migration of Northeast Arctic cod along the northwest coast, effort allocation behavior of coastal fleet, together with institutional regulations necessitate the substitution of fishing effort across different fishing locations within the fishing season to maximize expected return. The results of our study further reveal that the Arctic region to target cod is the biggest contributor to annual fishing revenue. By contrast, conducting saithe fishery in the southwest of the Norwegian coast has the lowest economic contribution. The results from Monte Carlo simulation demonstrate that the proposed model is effective and applicable for effort allocation decision analysis.

Highlights

  • Economic theories predict that commercial fishing is undertaken to maximize expected economic return (Gordon, 1953, 1954), which is influenced by fish availability, measured by catch per unit of effort (CPUE) (Hilborn and Walters, 1992; Campbell, 2004) and market prices as well as the decisions underlying effort allocation such as when and where to fish and what to target (Béné and Tewfik, 2001; Birkenbach et al, 2020)

  • Given the complexity to characterize the optimal harvest of multi-species fishery, the aim of this paper is to find the optimal effort allocation to maximize the economic return in the codfish fishery operated by the trawl fleet in three heavily trawled regions, taking into account individual vessel quotas (IVQs) regulations and bycatch considerations

  • It is conventionally assumed that fishers displace their fishing effort according to the expected economic returns from fishing in the available fisheries and locations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Economic theories predict that commercial fishing is undertaken to maximize expected economic return (Gordon, 1953, 1954), which is influenced by fish availability, measured by catch per unit of effort (CPUE) (Hilborn and Walters, 1992; Campbell, 2004) and market prices as well as the decisions underlying effort allocation such as when and where to fish and what to target (Béné and Tewfik, 2001; Birkenbach et al, 2020). The main target species are Northeast Arctic (NEA) cod (Gadus morhua), saithe (Pollachius virens), and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), known as codfish (Birkenbach et al, 2020). These species constitute one of the most commercially valuable quota portfolios and comprise around 80% of total landings and revenue of this fleet (Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries, 2019). The TACs and IVQs are annually determined on a species-specific basis (Standal and Asche, 2018) Under this management scheme, overfishing is not allowed and trawlers with over-quota catches are penalized (Johnsen and Eliasen, 2011).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.