Abstract
Background The burden of morbidity and mortality in England, is greater among priority groups such as those with lower income or routine and manual occupations. Using a microsimulation model, we estimate projected changes in smoking prevalence according to socio-economic position under selected policy scenarios that are relevant to ongoing policy implementation and debate. Methods Initiated using real-world data from adult (16+) respondents to the Smoking Toolkit Study (STS), the ‘QuitSimX’ microsimulation model projects individual-level smoking uptake and cessation in England over time. The simulation was run under two separate policy scenarios, raising the age of sale of tobacco products to 21 (simulations run from 2013–2023), and moving a proportion of all individuals quitting using a certain method (such as over the counter nicotine replacement therapy), or no method, to using e-cigarettes instead (simulations run from 2015–2025). Under each scenario, the size of effect were specified, and the outcomes simulated and assessed by indicators of socio-economic position. Absolute and relative inequalities were examined by comparing at the initial and final timepoint the i) absolute difference in smoking prevalence between less and more advantaged groups subgroups and ii) the ratio of smoking prevalence. Results While absolute and relative inequalities in smoking prevalence declined across the simulated period under all policy scenarios and the counterfactual ‘no intervention’ scenario, at the final time point absolute and relative inequalities between social grades and regions were similar across all scenarios, with the exception that the relative (but not absolute) inequality under the most impactful tobacco 21 scenario as marginally higher than under the baseline scenario. Conclusion A microsimulation model of smoking in England illustrates that absolute inequalities are projected to decrease under a Tobacco 21 or quitting with e-cigarettes scenario but that some policy solutions (Tobacco 21) may result in an increase in relative inequalities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.