Abstract

People often recognize and remember faces of individuals within their own race more easily than those of other races. While behavioral research has long suggested that the Other-Race Effect (ORE) is due to extensive experience with one’s own race group, the neural mechanisms underlying the effect have remained elusive. Predominant theories of the ORE have argued that the effect is mainly caused by processing disparities between same and other-race faces during early stages of perceptual encoding. Our findings support an alternative view that the ORE is additionally shaped by mnemonic processing mechanisms beyond perception and attention. Using a “pattern separation” paradigm based on computational models of episodic memory, we report evidence that the ORE may be driven by differences in successful memory discrimination across races as a function of degree of interference or overlap between face stimuli. In contrast, there were no ORE-related differences on a comparable match-to-sample task with no long-term memory load, suggesting that the effect is not simply attributable to visual and attentional processes. These findings suggest that the ORE may emerge in part due to “tuned” memory mechanisms that may enhance same-race, at the expense of other-race face detection.

Highlights

  • People often recognize and remember faces of individuals within their own race more than those of other races

  • Mnemonic discrimination and match-to-sample face recognition tasks were developed to test the contribution of memory and perceptual/attentional mechanisms to the Other-Race Effect (ORE) (Fig. 1)

  • We characterized the ORE using a mnemonic discrimination task, which unlike standard recognition tasks introduced face lures of varying similarity from previously presented faces. This task is sensitive to pattern separation, a neural computation that supports discrimination among similar experiences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

People often recognize and remember faces of individuals within their own race more than those of other races. It is posited that qualitatively different processing styles emerge early in perceptual processing as a function of this relative experience, where same-race (SR) faces are processed in a configural manner, while OR faces are processed in a feature-based manner[2] In this context, configural processing is defined as extracting the relations between facial features (such as eyes, mouth, nose) of a SR face, allowing it to be encoded as a unified object rather than a set of features[10,11,12,13,14]. It is suggested that SR faces are more deeply attended to and individuated, while OR faces are processed in a shallower manner due to cognitive labeling as ‘out-group’, or other[20,21,22,23] These attentional differences at encoding are believed to be the major contributors to the ORE in subsequent memory

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call