Abstract

The own-race bias (ORB) is a reliable phenomenon across cultural and racial groups where unfamiliar faces from other races are usually remembered more poorly than own-race faces (Meissner and Brigham, 2001). By adopting a yes–no recognition paradigm, we found that ORB was pronounced across race groups (Malaysian–Malay, Malaysian–Chinese, Malaysian–Indian, and Western–Caucasian) when faces were presented with only internal features (Experiment 1), implying that growing up in a profoundly multiracial society does not necessarily eliminate ORB. Using a procedure identical to Experiment 1, we observed a significantly greater increment in recognition performance for other-race faces than for own-race faces when the external features (e.g. facial contour and hairline) were presented along with the internal features (Experiment 2)—this abolished ORB. Contrary to assumptions based on the contact hypothesis, participants’ self-reported amount of interracial contact on a social contact questionnaire did not significantly predict the magnitude of ORB. Overall, our findings suggest that the level of exposure to other-race faces accounts for only a small part of ORB. In addition, the present results also support the notion that different neural mechanisms may be involved in processing own- and other-race faces, with internal features of own-race faces being processed more effectively, whereas external features dominate representations of other-race faces.

Highlights

  • The human face conveys a range of important social information, including race

  • One explanation offered for own-race bias (ORB) suggests that processing of facial information can be improved through contact with others

  • Own-race bias was found in all race groups: when presented with face images containing only internal features, Malaysian participants (Chinese Malay, Indian) showed a recognition deficit for other-race faces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The human face conveys a range of important social information, including race. Own-race bias has been extensively researched and is found consistently across different cultures and races, including individuals with Caucasian, African, and Asian ancestry (see Meissner and Brigham, 2001, for a meta-analytic review) and in both adults (Tanaka and Pierce, 2009; Caharel et al, 2011) and children (Anzures et al, 2014) as young as 3-month-old infants One early explanation for ORB was based on the hypothesis that there may be inherent physical differences in facial features between races that make discrimination easier within some races than others. There is no evidence to suggest on the basis of either anthropometric or behavioral data that faces from one race are physically more homogenous than faces from other races (e.g. Goldstein and Chance, 1978; Walker and Tanaka, 2003; Walker and Hewstone, 2006b)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call