Abstract

In the realm of wafer level packaging (WLP), chip scale packaging (SCP), micro-electronic machines (MEM's), etc. the ebb and flow of lithographic upgrades takes on a very important role. Any improvement than can be made at the lowest possible cost has a significant impact on the final cost of the device. Today, feature size, profile of the resist feature, and overall control of the process are now considered critical parameters for back end of line (BEOL) processes. Current lithographic procedures typically utilized 1X full field lithography (1XFFL) tools in proximity print mode to generate images for BEOL processes. In the past, some production facilities have considered alternate, more expensive methods to generate smaller feature sizes. One method under renewed consideration is contact exposure using full field lithography equipment. Although, contact exposure is a technically capable and proven imaging technology it is expensive due to the increased levels of defects and increased levels of defects and increased costs due to frequent mask-cleaning cycles. Mask cleaning may be reduced or eliminated by using a Teflon coated mask, however, many people still believe this is not a viable alternative for vertical slide walls on thick films. There now is a low cost, robust alternative. By making a small change to existing 1XFFL tools, imaging capability can be significantly improved to accommodate current and future needs of BEOL processes. Images with vertical sidewall profiles in films 5 to 100 microns thickness may be produced effortlessly using proximity exposure. Thickness changes affecting dose as seen with standard processes are also minimized.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call