Abstract

Introduction: Advances in experimental psychology have led to a better understanding of automatic, unconscious processes, referred to as attentional biases. Despite the growing evidence from meta-analytical studies, we still do not understand why some individuals have a greater magnitude of these biases, and why others have none. There has been little focus on elucidating individual differences and task parameters that affect the overall magnitude of the biases. In this opinion piece, we will attempt to identify these. We will then discuss both the research and clinical implications. Methods and Analysis: To identify the factors that modulated the magnitude of attentional biases across all the substance disorders (i.e., opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant-use disorders), we performed a search using the bibliographic databases PubMed and MEDLINE. The search terminologies “attention bias” or “cognitive bias” or “approach bias” or “avoidance bias” were used when we looked for relevant articles. Results: It was evident from the published literature that several individual differences and factors modulated the magnitude of baseline biases. Across opioid, cannabis, and stimulant-use disorders, the most common individual differences identified were the severity of the dependence and the quantity of substance used. For both opioid and cannabis disorders the timing of stimulus presentation influenced the detection of attentional bias; it appeared that short stimulus timing was better able to detect attentional bias. Other identified individual differences included subjective craving and impulsiveness. The results highlight several research and clinical implications. Conclusions: The discovery of these individual differences and factors of the task paradigm that affect the magnitude of attentional biases will help in the future conceptualization of attention-bias-modification intervention.

Highlights

  • Advances in experimental psychology have led to a better understanding of automatic, unconscious processes, referred to as attentional biases [1]

  • In their meta-analysis, O’Neill et al (2020) [6], highlighted that there was a greater magnitude of attentional bias towards cannabis stimuli observed in cannabis users

  • In the study by Campbell et al (2018) [19] to differentiate between users’ and non-users’ attentional biases, they reported that the intensity of cannabis used, correlated with the number of errors made during the testing process, and affected the magnitude of attentional biases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advances in experimental psychology have led to a better understanding of automatic, unconscious processes, referred to as attentional biases. Cannabis, and stimulant-use disorders, the most common individual differences identified were the severity of the dependence and the quantity of substance used. This attraction can result in a partial slip or full relapse back to addictive behavior These biases arise when the chronic usage of substances results in increased automatic processing of substance-related cues, and corresponding inhibition of the normal cognitive control processes [3]. These biases are typically assessed by means of indirect measures (i.e., measures of reaction time) using tasks like the visual probe task [4]. In another meta-analysis, O’Neill et al (2020) [6] focused on individuals with cannabis-use disorders and found greater attentional biases amongst cannabis users compared with controls

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call