Abstract

Overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) light is associated with multiple health risks, from sunburn and prematurely aging skin to the development of skin cancers. The ingestion of photoprotective natural compounds through diet or supplementation is one method to increase the skin’s UV-resistance. This study’s primary objective was to determine the cellular photoprotective properties of an ingestible skincare supplement (trade name “Anti-Aging Formula” [AAF]) and compare them to its constituent active ingredients: fish oil-derived omega-3s eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), borage-derived omega-6 gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), paprika- and marigold-derived carotenoids, zeaxanthin and lutein, respectively, and vitamin D3. AAF, but not the separate individual ingredients, significantly increased the viability of primary human dermal fibroblasts after UVA exposure compared to the vehicle control. AAF and EPA/DHA-containing fish oil demonstrated similar UVB photoprotective properties whereas GLA, the carotenoids, and vitamin D3 had no significant effect. The second objective was to explore possible mechanisms of action of AAF’s photoprotective effects. AAF-treatment increased cellular antioxidant activity and the expression of genes in the glutathione and peroxiredoxin (PRDX)/thioredoxin (TXN) antioxidant pathways, suggesting an antioxidant mechanism of action. It also diminished cellular arachidonic acid (AA) levels and decreased the expression of the downstream pro-inflammatory prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) gene, suggesting an anti-inflammatory mechanism of action. In conclusion, AAF is UVA/B photoprotective when applied directly to primary human dermal fibroblasts. In addition, its photoprotective effects are mainly due to its EPA/DHA components and may relate to its cellular antioxidant effects and inhibition of the AA/PTGS2 inflammatory pathway.

Highlights

  • The cells that make up our skin protect us from our environments’ stressors, such as pathogens, pollution, and UV light

  • UVA exposure (216 J/cm2) reduced the viability of the vehicle-treated fibroblasts to 19%, which increased to 55%, 80%, and 66% when the fibroblasts were pre-treated with 0.005% AAF for 1, 7, or 14-days, respectively (Figure 2B)

  • UVB’s IC50 quantified via methyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell viability assays was 1.7-fold higher in 14-day AAF- versus vehicle-treated fibroblasts (Figure 2C) versus vehicle-treated cells, fibroblasts pre-treated with AAF were 31% and 11% more viable after UVA or UVB exposures, respectively (Figures 2D–E)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cells that make up our skin protect us from our environments’ stressors, such as pathogens, pollution, and UV light. Daily ingestion of the commercial skincare supplement AAF was photoprotective based on an average 39% and 84% increase in minimal erythema dose (MED; the smallest amount of UV radiation that produces skin redness) after 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. 100% of the trial’s 28 participants had higher MED values after 8-weeks of supplementation versus their baseline values [20]. In an effort to better understand the photoprotective activity of AAF at the cellular level, we aimed to: develop methodology to quantify UVA/B photoprotection using human dermal fibroblasts, compare the photoprotective effects of AAF versus its individual components, and develop insight into AAF’s cellular photoprotective mechanisms of action

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.