Abstract

Evidential Reasoning (ER) approach is a widely used information aggregation method to deal with uncertain information in decision making. However, as decision-making problem becomes complicated, it is usually difficult for experts to provide accurate belief degrees for each evaluation grade. In this regard, the linguistic belief structure allows experts to give belief degrees with linguistic terms. In this study, we extend the classical ER approach to the linguistic belief-based ER (LB-ER) approach in which the hesitancy degrees are introduced to determine the weights of experts. Afterwards, the LB-ER approach is further enhanced to deal with multi-expert multi-criteria decision-making (MEMCDM) problems, where the best worst method (BWM) is introduced to generate the weights of criteria. Finally, to verify the practicability of the proposed method, we implement the method in lung cancer diagnosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.