Abstract

BackgroundEver since Darwin, evolutionary biologists have studied sexual selection driving differences in appearance and behaviour between males and females. An unchallenged paradigm in such studies is that one sex (usually the male) signals its quality as a mate to the other sex (usually the female), who is choosy in accepting a partner. Here, we hypothesize that in polygamous species these roles change dynamically with the mating status of males and females, depending on direct reproductive costs and benefits of multiple matings, and on sperm competition. We test this hypothesis by assessing fitness costs and benefits of multiple matings in both males and females in a polygamous moth species, as in moths not males but females are the signalers and males are the responders.ResultsWe found that multiple matings confer fitness costs and benefits for both sexes. Specifically, the number of matings did not affect the longevity of males or females, but only 67% of the males and 14% of the females mated successfully in all five nights. In addition, the female’s reproductive output increased with multiple matings, although when paired with a new virgin male every night, more than 3 matings decreased her reproductive output, so that the Bateman gradient for females fit a quadratic model better than a linear model. The male’s reproductive success was positively affected by the number of matings and a linear regression line best fit the data. Simulations of the effect of sperm competition showed that increasing last-male paternity increases the steepness of the male Bateman gradient and thus the male’s relative fitness gain from additional mating. Irrespective of last-male paternity value, the female Bateman gradient is steeper than the male one for up to three matings.ConclusionOur results suggest that choosiness in moths may well change throughout the mating season, with males being more choosy early in the season and females being more choosy after having mated at least three times. This life-history perspective on the costs and benefits of multiple matings for both sexes sheds new light on sexual selection forces acting on sexual signals and responses.

Highlights

  • Ever since Darwin, evolutionary biologists have studied sexual selection driving differences in appearance and behaviour between males and females

  • To determine how sexual selection dynamics change over the course of a lifetime in a polygamous moth species, we investigated the direct reproductive costs and benefits of multiple matings, as well as the role of sperm competition in reproductive success

  • To determine the fitness costs and benefits of multiple matings, we assessed longevity and lifetime fecundity and fertility of individual moths by setting up four treatments: a) one virgin male or female was placed per beaker and observed for five consecutive nights, b) virgin individuals were paired with a virgin mate on the first night, after which the sexes were separated into different beakers, c) individual moths were paired with a new, virgin mate every night for five consecutive nights, d) individual moths were paired with the same mate every night for five consecutive nights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ever since Darwin, evolutionary biologists have studied sexual selection driving differences in appearance and behaviour between males and females. We hypothesize that in polygamous species these roles change dynamically with the mating status of males and females, depending on direct reproductive costs and benefits of multiple matings, and on sperm competition. Gao et al BMC Evolutionary Biology (2020) 20:53 maximize their fitness by maximizing the number of matings, while the reproductive success of females was assumed to be largely independent of the number of matings [1, 8]. These assumptions are generally known as the “Bateman’s principle” [4, 14]. To determine the differential benefits to reproductive success to be gained by males and females when mating multiple times, the “Bateman gradient” should be calculated [7], which is the relation between the number of mates and the number of offspring, the least-square regression of reproductive success on mating success [17]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call