Abstract

Engaging students in metacognition can improve their learning outcomes. Students’ consideration of their learning philosophy is one way for students to be metacognitive about their learning. This study analyzed the effect of a learning philosophy assignment on students’ intellectual development and mastery of first-year biology and second-year biochemistry course content. All students were invited to complete the Learning Environment Preferences (LEP) survey at the beginning and end of the term to determine if students’ cognitive complexity was impacted by the assignment. The ability to master course content was assessed by comparing students’ midterm and final exam marks. We found that the learning philosophy assignment rescued Bachelor of Science students in the first-year biology course from a decrease in cognitive complexity. Additionally, the guided metacognition rescued second-year biochemistry students from performing poorer on the final relative to the midterm exam and promoted an increase in their cognitive complexity. These results suggest that a learning philosophy assignment may be an effective way of engaging students’ in metacognition of their learning to promote their intellectual development and mastery of course material.

Highlights

  • Paired one-tailed t-tests detected a significant difference (**p = 0.00446) between the midterm and final exam scores (% mark) of students who did not complete the learning philosophy assignment (-LP; N = 19)

  • There were no significant differences between the midterm and final exam scores (% mark) of students who did complete the learning philosophy assignment (+LP; N = 24)

  • There were no significant differences in the intellectual development of students who did complete the learning philosophy assignment (+LP; N = 21)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Paired one-tailed t-tests detected a significant difference (**p = 0.00446) between the midterm and final exam scores (% mark) of students who did not complete the learning philosophy assignment (-LP; N = 19). There were no significant differences between the midterm and final exam scores (% mark) of students who did complete the learning philosophy assignment (+LP; N = 24). 4 In this pre-test/post-test design, students' level of intellectual development (CCI) was considered before and after the learning philosophy (LP) assignment intervention.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.