Abstract

BackgroundFailure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice. However, little is known about patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) in CPGs development and implementation. This study aims at identifying what it is about PPIP that works, in which contexts are PPIP most likely to be effective, and how are PPIP assumed to lead to better CPGs development and implementation.Methods and designA knowledge synthesis will be conducted in four phases. In phase one, literature on PPIP in CPGs development will be searched through bibliographic databases. A call for bibliographic references and unpublished reports will also be sent via the mailing lists of relevant organizations. Eligible publications will include original qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods study designs reporting on a PPIP pertaining to CPGs development or implementation. They will also include documents produced by CPGs organizations to describe their PPIP. In phase two, grounded in the program's logic model, two independent reviewers will extract data to collect information on the principal components and activities of PPIP, the resources needed, the contexts in which PPIP were developed and tested, and the assumptions underlying PPIP. Quality assessment will be made for all retained publications. Our literature search will be complemented with interviews of key informants drawn from of a purposive sample of CPGs developers and patient/public representatives. In phase three, we will synthesize evidence from both the publications and interviews data using template content analysis to organize the identified components in a meaningful framework of PPIP theories. During a face-to-face workshop, findings will be validated with different stakeholder and a final toolkit for CPGs developers will be refined.DiscussionThe proposed research project will be among the first to explore the PPIP in CPGs development and implementation based on a wide range of publications and key informants interviews. It is anticipated that the results generated by the proposed study will significantly contribute to the improvement of the reconciliation of CPGs with patient preferences and values as well as with social norms.

Highlights

  • Failure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice

  • The role that patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) could play in CPGs development and implementation is increasingly attracting the attention of policymakers, health professionals, patients, and the public

  • Knowledge translation researchers will be interested in our results given their potential to advance a new paradigm in knowledge science: one that acknowledges the contribution of patients and the public in the creation and application of knowledge. This knowledge synthesis will provide decision-makers with the essential knowledge that is needed for elaborating effective PPIP in CPGs development and implementation, notably through the creation of an evidence-based toolkit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Failure to reconcile patient preferences and values as well as social norms with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations may hamper their implementation in clinical practice. Within the knowledge to action framework, CPGs are understood as the product of a knowledge tailoring strategy, translating primary and secondary research into specific recommendations for action [2]. Their application in clinical practice is expected to improve patient outcomes by promoting an effective, equitable, and rational utilization of resources [3]. The role that patients and public involvement programs (PPIP) could play in CPGs development and implementation is increasingly attracting the attention of policymakers, health professionals, patients, and the public

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call