Abstract

We propose a hysteretic model of hydraulic properties for dual‐porosity soils based on the bimodal van Genuchten model and Kool and Parker (K&P) hysteresis model. Hysteresis is considered only in the first pore domain, affecting mainly higher water contents, while a nonhysteretic behavior is assumed in the second pore domain, affecting mainly lower water contents. The main drying and wetting curves are described with the same set of parameters except for α1, which is different for the drying and wetting curves. The scanning hysteresis loops in the first subregion are also described using the K&P model. The hysteretic water retention model agrees reasonably well with drying and wetting retention curves and scanning loops observed for Andisols. Although the corresponding unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, evaluated using the Mualem pore‐size distribution model, as a function of the water content, K(θ), is nonhysteretic for higher water contents, unrealistic hysteresis occurs in K(θ) for lower water contents. To obtain an “almost” nonhysteretic K(θ) function for the entire range of water contents, an additional constraint on the value of the α1 parameter for K(θ) is imposed, and a single value is used for both drying and wetting curves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.