Abstract
Silicon nickel, a cast nickel alloy containing about 3% silicon, had been used for threaded couplings in chemical delivery systems for over 40 years because it had necessary corrosion resistance and did not gall when mated with 316 and other stainless steels. In 2001, it was learned that this material was no longer available from long-time sources, and a laboratory study was undertaken to find a substitute alloy. Laboratory tests evaluated the threshold galling stress (using a modified ASTM G98 procedure) of six stainless steels against two titanium alloys and two proprietary alloys that allegedly (by their manufacturer) have good galling resistance. Silicon nickel was also tested as the material to “beat” in galling tests. The silicon nickel exhibited poor galling characteristics against all test counterfaces. Titanium with 6% A1 and 4% V showed good galling resistance against all counterfaces, but produced significant transfer to some counterfaces. One of the galling-resistant alloys exhibited good galling characteristics but transferred less. The galling-resistant alloy, which was essentially an austenitic stainless steel with increased nitrogen, silicon and manganese, was recommended as the substitute for the silicon nickel. It is thought that the silicon nickel worked in service because its porosity and silicide inclusions produced very high surface roughness in machining, and it was the porous, rough surface that provided its apparent galling resistance.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call