Abstract

In recent years, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) has been widely applied in the field of soundscape ecology. Meanwhile, acoustic indices, as an important tool for rapid biodiversity assessment (RBA), have also attracted increasing attention. However, considerable evidence demonstrates that existing acoustic indices are susceptible to noise, which poses a challenge for wider applications of acoustic indices. In this work, we firstly provide insights into how noise affects the widely used acoustic diversity index (ADI), revealing that the global threshold scheme (i.e., −50 dBFS for all time–frequency bins) to generate the binary spectrogram (spectrogram containing time–frequency bins denoted as ‘1′ with power above the threshold and ‘0′ below) is the key factor that makes ADI sensitive to noise. To address this problem, we propose a revised ADI version named frequency-dependent acoustic diversity index (FADI), which employs a new threshold scheme to reduce noise impacts on its values. Specifically, considering that the noise floor along frequency axis usually varies in practice, i.e., a colored noise rather than a white noise exists in field recordings, floating thresholds adapted to the noise level at each frequency bin were employed and further incorporated with the global threshold of ADI. Controlled computational experiments using field recordings were conducted where manipulated noise levels were introduced as different signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). It was shown that the proposed FADI was significantly robust to noise within a much wider SNR range as compared with ADI. Furthermore, a singular example using a real-world recording also verified its effectiveness and highlighted the promising potential of FADI in applications of PAM.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call