Abstract

Despite a wide range of energy-efficient technologies, financial products and public incentives are already available, the private as well as the public sector are struggling to invest in energy efficient solutions for buildings. The primary barriers are the high initial cost and the uncertain payback period of the energy refurbishment. Allowing for different scenario testing and considering interactions among different building energy systems, building energy simulation tools can help investors overcoming such barriers by offering support to the technical planning of energy refurbishment kits through quantitative information rather than qualitative. The energy performance and comfort of three reference multifamily residential buildings typologies were evaluated considering three envelope retrofitting performance levels (high-medium-low insulated and airtight) and different heating and domestic hot water systems (heat pump, boiler, district heating). The tested envelope retrofitting performance levels allow for heating need reduction between 50% and 90% compared to the reference case. The active cooling system is not accounted for and building energy simulations outputs include thermal comfort evaluation and overheating risk assessment during the summer season. The potential of photovoltaic system combined with heat pump is evaluated in the three reference cases leading to up to 30% of load coverage.

Highlights

  • Despite a wide range of energy-efficient technologies, financial products and public incentives are already available, the private as well as the public sector are struggling to invest in energy efficient solutions for buildings

  • Investors are confused by the complexity and the fragmentation of the energy refurbishment market and sometimes they distrust the multiple actors and the different interests involved along the energy refurbishment process

  • The work presented is part of the EFRE-FESR KlimaKit project which has the objective to drive and foster the Architecture Engineering Construction (AEC) and energy sector to collaborate in the development of integrated solutions for energy retrofit of residential buildings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite a wide range of energy-efficient technologies, financial products and public incentives are already available, the private as well as the public sector are struggling to invest in energy efficient solutions for buildings. The primary barriers are the high initial cost and the uncertain payback period of the energy refurbishment. Allowing for different scenario testing and considering interactions among different building energy systems, building energy simulation tools can help investors overcoming such barriers by offering support to the technical planning of energy refurbishment kits through quantitative information rather than qualitative. The work presented is part of the EFRE-FESR KlimaKit project which has the objective to drive and foster the Architecture Engineering Construction (AEC) and energy sector to collaborate in the development of integrated solutions for energy retrofit of residential buildings

Retrofit packages
Envelope performance levels
Reference buildings
Big multifamily house – Construction period 1976-91
Small multifamily house – Construction period 1976-91
Small multifamily house – Construction period 1946-75
Methodological approach to energy simulation
Heating and DHW settings
Assumptions for PV optimization
Results
Energy performance vs operative costs
NZEB-L2
PV production
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call