Abstract

A frequent claim in the radial basis function (RBF) literature is that with a wise choice of the “shape parameter” α, spectrally accurate RBFs can be “spectral-plus” in the sense that the RBF approximation is orders of magnitude more accurate than the corresponding spectral method. This is surprising because in the so-called “flat limit”, α→0, RBF methods provably reduce to a standard spectral method. On an infinite uniform grid, for example, Gaussian, hyperbolic secant, inverse quadratic, and multiquadric and inverse multiquadric RBFs reduce to the classical sinc basis. Using the error theorem proved in Part 1, we show that indeed it is possible for RBFs to be greatly superior to the sinc basis. However, rather special conditions are required for this superiority. The generic case is that RBFs are less accurate than the sinc method for nonzero values of the shape parameter.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.