Abstract

This paper discusses the development of a flow stress model to simulate the AA3104-H19 alloy under the conditions of large plastic deformations characteristic of the beverage can manufacturing process. This study focuses on the first five steps of this process: cupping, redrawing, ironing #1, ironing #2, ironing #3. These are the stages that reduce the thickness of the base material to the maximum, resulting in an effective strain of more than 2.0, unattainable in conventional plastometric tests. To solve this problem, the specific calculation-experimental method for the development of the flow stress model was proposed. Based on the FEM modeling of the technological process, data on the history of deformation and the trajectory of movement of the selected points of the material at all stages of the production were obtained. Microspecimens for the tensile tests were taken from the points of the beverage can wall that were determined in this way. The initial strain of each sample was taken from the FEM simulation. In this way, the tensile curves were obtained for the material points at different stages of the production. The processing of these curves allowed the creation of a flow stress model for large strains, corresponding to production conditions. The tensile tests were performed on a Zwick Z250 machine at room temperature and strain rate of 0.005 s−1. The FEM-based algorithm for the determination of empirical coefficients of the analytical flow stress model is presented. The final flow stress model covers the range of effective strain from 0–2. Validation of the developed model based on the measured beverage can thicknesses showed that a flow stress model was developed that correctly and accurately describes the forming process.

Highlights

  • The first drawn and ironed manufacturing process of a two-piece beverage can dates back to 1963

  • Numerical simulations can be helpful in the can manufacturing processes for optimization of the material hardening exponent [1], to determine the friction coefficient in the ironing process [2], force and stress level reduction during ironing [3], to investigate cup wall thickness after deep drawing [4], to reduce material consumption [5], to improve the shape of the can dome to increase its inside pressure resistance [6], or for the development of new tool designs [7]

  • The analysis of the tensile tests shows that the flow stress–strain curves practically coincided; the standard deviation was 0.64 MPa and 3 MPa for the yield stress (YS) and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first drawn and ironed manufacturing process of a two-piece beverage can dates back to 1963. For the simulation results to be reflected in reality, a material model must be defined correctly. This model should be defined to cover a range of parameters (temperature, strain, strain rate, etc.) relevant to the process. The work in [8] was devoted to the process of a numerical simulation for beverage can manufacturing. The authors of this paper were forced to use a different material model for the simulation because, as was mentioned, the one for AA3104-H19 was not yet available. There are many papers in which the flow curves for this alloy are presented with the effective strain limited, for example to

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call