Abstract

Insight into plant genomes at the cytomolecular level provides useful information about their karyotype structure, enabling inferences about taxonomic relationships and evolutionary origins. The Old World lupins (OWL) demonstrate a high level of genomic diversification involving variation in chromosome numbers (2n = 32–52), basic chromosome numbers (x = 5–7, 9, 13) and in nuclear genome size (2C DNA = 0.97–2.68 pg). Lupins comprise both crop and wild species and provide an intriguing system to study karyotype evolution. In order to investigate lupin chromosome structure, heterologous FISH was used. Sixteen BACs that had been generated as chromosome markers for the reference species, Lupinus angustifolius, were used to identify chromosomes in the wild species and explore karyotype variation. While all “single-locus” in L. angustifolius, in the wild lupins these clones proved to be “single-locus,” “single-locus” with additional signals, “repetitive” or had no detectable BAC-FISH signal. The diverse distribution of the clones in the targeted genomes suggests a complex evolution history, which possibly involved multiple chromosomal changes such as fusions/fissions and repetitive sequence amplification. Twelve BACs were sequenced and we found numerous transposable elements including DNA transposons as well as LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons with varying quantity and composition among the different lupin species. However, at this preliminary stage, no correlation was observed between the pattern of BAC-FISH signals and the repeat content in particular BACs. Here, we describe the first BAC-based chromosome-specific markers for the wild species: L. cosentinii, L. cryptanthus, L. pilosus, L. micranthus and one New World lupin, L. multiflorus. These BACs could constitute the basis for an assignment of the chromosomal and genetic maps of other lupins, e.g., L. albus and L. luteus. Moreover, we identified karyotype variation that helps illustrate the relationships between the lupins and the extensive cytological diversity within this group. In this study we premise that lupin genomes underwent at least two rounds of fusion and fission events resulting in the reduction in chromosome number from 2n = 52 through 2n = 40 to 2n = 32, followed by chromosome number increment to 2n = 42.

Highlights

  • Molecular cytogenetics offers a toolbox for integrating chromosomal data with other genetic and genomic information in order to obtain a more holistic view of genome structure and evolution

  • This is a monophyletic genus in the Genistoid clade, comprising ∼275 species that are geographically grouped as Old World lupins (OWL) and New World lupins (NWL)

  • They originate from diverse environmental habitats: L. cryptanthus is considered as a subspecies of L. angustifolius with a similar ecology and geographical distribution; L. micranthus is distributed evenly across the entire Mediterranean; L. pilosus occurs natively in the north-eastern Mediterranean; L. cosentinii, TABLE 1 | Key taxonomical and cytogenetic characteristics of studied Lupinus species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Molecular cytogenetics offers a toolbox for integrating chromosomal data with other genetic and genomic information in order to obtain a more holistic view of genome structure and evolution. The genus Lupinus (lupins) belongs to the legume family (Fabaceae) that diverged from other legumes around 17–22.5 million year ago (mya) (Drummond et al, 2012) This is a monophyletic genus in the Genistoid clade, comprising ∼275 species that are geographically grouped as Old World lupins (OWL) and New World lupins (NWL). Drummond et al (2012) endorsed that the genus Lupinus derived from Old World and distinguished three evolutionary distinct lineages: (i) OWL (4.6–12.5 mya) close to the unifoliolate species from eastern North America (0.1–2.4 mya), (ii) the eastern South American species (2.3–7.1 mya) and (iii) the western NWL (5.0– 13.2 mya) including the Andean and Mexican species (1.2–3.5 mya) derived from a paraphyletic group from western North America (2.1–5.5 mya)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call