Abstract

BackgroundInvasive species affect community dynamics and ecosystem functions, but the mechanisms of their impacts are poorly understood. Hypotheses on invasion impact range from Superior Competitor to Novel Function, from Enemy Escape to Microbial Mediation. In this study, we examined the effects of an urban tree invader, Acer platanoides (Norway maple, NM), on a mesic deciduous forest in contrast to its native congener Acer rubrum (red maple, RM) with a split-plot design experiment. A total of 720 maple seedlings were transplanted to 72 plots under 24 trees of three canopy types. The three experimental treatments were removal of resource competition at above- and belowground and removal of leaf-litter effect. Soil moisture and nitrogen-related microbial activities were followed for each plot.ResultsWe found that partial canopy removal increased canopy openness and light transmission to the forest floor, but to a greater extent under NM than under RM trees. NM seedlings were more shade tolerant than RM seedlings in height growth. During the reciprocal transplantation in the mixed forest, biomass accumulation of NM seedlings under RM trees were twice as much as under NM, while that of RM seedlings under NM trees was 23.5% less than under RM. Soil net nitrification and relative nitrification were significantly higher, but mineralization rate was much lower under NM than under RM trees, which would lead to faster N leaching and lower N availability in the soil. Plots with litter removal had significantly higher seedling mortality due to herbivory by the end of 2 years, especially for NM seedlings under NM trees. Trenching enhanced soil water availability but there was no difference among canopy types.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that invasion of NM not only altered forest canopy structure but also changed herbivory rate for seedlings and N dynamics in the soils. NM seedlings were more shade tolerant under NM canopies than RM seedlings and were more protected by NM litter under NM canopies than under RM canopies. These altered biotic and abiotic environments will likely facilitate further invasion of NM in the forests, hence positive feedbacks, and make it an increasingly serious tree invader in North America.

Highlights

  • Invasive species affect community dynamics and ecosystem functions, but the mechanisms of their impacts are poorly understood

  • Norway maple in the monospecific stand (NMmon) had the greatest increase in canopy openness (+ 243.7%) and largest decrease in LAI4Ring (− 49.0%) and LAI5Ring (− 47.0%), the effective leaf area index (LAI) integrated over zenith angles of 0–60 and 0–75°, respectively

  • Increase in total transmitted light with canopy removal was much greater under NMmon (313.9%) than under Red maple in the mixed forest (RMmix) and Norway maple in the mixed forest (NMmix) (153.4% and 147.5%, respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasive species affect community dynamics and ecosystem functions, but the mechanisms of their impacts are poorly understood. Plant-driven changes in community composition and ecosystem processes could create feedback mechanisms that may increase the impact on and invasibility of the ecosystem (Ehrenfeld and Scott 2001; Fine 2002; Levine et al 2006; Suding et al 2013; Shouman et al 2017). Such feedbacks will have important ramifications for the management of invasive species and restoration of native communities. It is essential to quantify the feedbacks and elucidate the mechanisms to improve our understanding of the impact of invasive species on native communities, many of which are undergoing significant changes as a consequence of invasion by exotic plant species

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call