A fault diagnostic method for oil-immersed transformer based on multiple probabilistic output algorithms and improved DS evidence theory

Abstract

Power transformer is one of the most vital equipment in the electric power systems, which serves as the connection of power networks at different voltage levels. However, the power transformers in service are subjected to various stresses like thermal stress and electrical stress, which may lead to several faults such as arching, partial discharge and overheating. In order to detect these incipient faults and ensure the normal operation of power transformers, the diagnostic methods based on Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) have been developed. However, the DGA methods suffer from low diagnostic accuracy. On the other hand, with the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a lot of intelligent algorithms have been applied in this area. However, most traditional AI algorithms are hard classification, which may cause the wrong diagnosis of faults. To overcome those disadvantages, a method based on the improved DS evidence theory and multiple probabilistic output algorithms is proposed in this paper to improve the performance of fault diagnosis of oil-immersed transformers. Firstly, the performance of the soft and hard classification algorithms is compared and analyzed. After that, three diagnostic models based on the Multiclass Relevance Vector Machine (MRVM), Multiclass Support Vector Machine (MSVM) and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) are established. In order to improve the accuracy of these models, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is used to optimize their hyper-parameters. Finally, the combination of these three probabilistic output models is achieved based on the improved Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory, which can help to obtain a more accurate fault diagnosis result by fusing multiple algorithm results. The case study results show that the proposed method achieves a probabilistic output for the fault diagnosis of oil-immersed transformers and overcomes the deficiency of traditional DGA methods which are difficult to get accurate diagnosis results and can’t summarize the fault development rule inductively.