Abstract

Tracing load-displacement paths in structural mechanics problems is complicated in the presence of critical points of instability where conventional load- or displacement control fails. To deal with this, arc-length methods have been developed since the 1970s, where control is taken over increments of load at these critical points, to allow full transit of the load-displacement path. However, despite their wide use and incorporation into commercial finite element software, conventional arc-length methods still struggle to cope with non-zero displacement constraints. In this paper we present a new displacement-controlled arc-length method that overcomes these shortcomings through a novel scheme of constraints on displacements and reaction forces. The new method is presented in a variety of serving suggestions, and is validated here on six very challenging problems involving truss and continuum finite elements. Despite this paper’s focus on structural mechanics, the new procedure can be applied to any problems that involve nonhomogeneous Dirichlet constraints and challenging equilibrium paths.

Highlights

  • In structural mechanics, the modelling of complex non-linear load-displacement paths poses difficulties in passing critical points, associated with instabilities found in practical engineering problems, such as buckling

  • This allows physical problems to be modelled, and their associated equilibrium paths to be traced, that are not possible with existing arc-length methods that rely on the specification of nodal forces

  • The graphical difference between spherical and cylindrical constraints are shown in Fig. 4, where the constraint equations are plotted in the three-dimensional axes of the prescribed displacements, the free displacements and the scaled reaction forces, and it can be observed that the intersection between the equilibrium path and the constraint is more severe in the spherical case

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The modelling of complex non-linear load-displacement paths poses difficulties in passing critical points, associated with instabilities found in practical engineering problems, such as buckling. The only boundary conditions that can be applied when adopting Riks solvers are tractions or body forces which, when integrated over the boundary of volume of the domain, manifest themselves as equivalent nodal forces This limits the physical problems that can be modelled using arc-length methods to those where it is appropriate to load the analysed structure via nodal forces, non-zero displacement constraints are often more appropriate especially when analysing the response of experimental tests where rigid constraints are imposed on the boundary of loaded specimens. This allows physical problems to be modelled, and their associated equilibrium paths to be traced, that are not possible with existing arc-length methods that rely on the specification of nodal forces. It is worth emphasising that the current displacement-controlled arc-length method differs from the technique under the same name presented in Verhoosel et al [39], as will be explained below

Governing equations
Strong and weak forms
Bubnov-Galerkin approximation method
Newton-Raphson scheme
A: ð12Þ
Arc-length constraints
Spherical constraint
Cylindrical constraint
Solution schemes
Consistent schemes
Arc-lengths
Numerical analysis
Single degree of freedom truss
 10À9 5 20
Two-member truss
XT Dlnþ1 T nþ1 Dlmax
Crisfield arch
Cantilever truss structure
Continuum cube
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.