Abstract

The application of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to computational fluid dynamics simulations has recently attracted tremendous attention. In the simulations of PINNs, the collocation points are required to conform to the fluid–solid interface on which no-slip boundary condition is enforced. Here, a novel PINN that incorporates the direct-forcing immersed boundary (IB) method is developed. In the proposed IB-PINN, the boundary conforming requirement in arranging the collocation points is eliminated. Instead, velocity penalties at some marker points are added to the loss function to enforce no-slip condition at the fluid–solid interface. In addition, force penalties at some collocation points are also added to the loss function to ensure compact distribution of the volume force. The effectiveness of IB-PINN in solving incompressible Navier–Stokes equations is demonstrated through the simulation of laminar flow past a circular cylinder that is placed in a channel. The solution obtained using the IB-PINN is compared with two reference solutions obtained using a conventional mesh-based IB method and an ordinary body-fitted grid method. The comparison indicates that the three solutions are in excellent agreement with each other. The influences of some parameters, such as weights for different loss components, numbers of collocation and marker points, hyperparameters in the neural network, etc., on the performance of IB-PINN are also studied. In addition, a transfer learning experiment is conducted on solving Navier–Stokes equations with different Reynolds numbers.

Highlights

  • Over the past few years, machine learning (ML) has permeated into various research areas of fluid mechanics [1], e.g., reduced-order modeling [2,3], wake-type clustering and classification [4,5,6,7], development of turbulence closure model [8,9,10], flow optimization and active control [11,12,13,14,15,16], to name a few

  • We use the proposed immersed boundary (IB)-physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to simulate fluid flow past a circular cylinder that is placed in a channel [22]

  • We propose using a direct-forcing IB method in combination with a PINN to solve steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past few years, machine learning (ML) has permeated into various research areas of fluid mechanics [1], e.g., reduced-order modeling [2,3], wake-type clustering and classification [4,5,6,7], development of turbulence closure model [8,9,10], flow optimization and active control [11,12,13,14,15,16], to name a few. The immersed boundary (IB) method is an alternative technique for handling complex and moving boundaries in mesh-based methods It utilizes non-boundary-conforming meshes in numerical discretization, and the no-slip condition on the surface of the immersed object is enforced by adding a volume force to the momentum equation. This method has recently gained its popularity due to the simplicity of implementation. We emphasize that the mesh-free nature of PINN can barely be considered a potential advantage in such a combination This is because mesh generation in the mesh-based IB method is significantly simplified and not a challenging task anymore.

Direct-Forcing Immersed Boundary Method
Physics-Informed Neural Network
Problem Description and Numerical Settings
Influences of Some Parameters on the Performance of IB-PINN
Transfer Learning
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call