Abstract

AbstractThere has been an ongoing debate regarding the mechanism that causes rate retardation phenomena observed in some reversible addition‐fragmentation transfer (RAFT) polymerization systems. Some attribute the retardation to slow fragmentation of adduct radicals, others attribute it to fast fragmentation coupled with cross‐termination between propagating and adduct radicals. There exists a difference of six orders of magnitude (10−2 versus 104/s) in the reported values of the fragmentation rate constant (kf0) for virtually similar RAFT systems of PStSC · (Ph)SPSt. In this communication, we explain the estimates of kf ∼ 104/s and the choices of the rate constant in modeling based on experimental polymerization rate and radical concentration data. The use of kf ∼ 10−2/s in the model results in a calculated adduct radical concentration level of 10−4 to 10−3 mol/L, which appears to directly contradict the reported electron spin resonance (ESR) data in the range of <10−6 mol/L. We hope that this open discussion can stimulate more effort to resolve this outstanding difference. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 2833–2839, 2003

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.