A dialectical approach for argument-based judgment aggregation

Richard Booth ,Martin Caminada

doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-179

A dialectical approach for argument-based judgment aggregation

Richard Booth , Martin Caminada

https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-179

Copy DOI

Publication Date: Sep 1, 2016

Affiliation: Cardiff University, University of Aberdeen

#Dialectical #Judgment Aggregation + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

The current paper provides a dialectical interpretation of the argumentation-based judgment aggregation operators of Caminada and Pigozzi. In particular, we define discussion-based proof procedures for the foundational concepts of down-admissible and up-complete. We then show how these proof procedures can be used as the basis of dialectical proof procedures for the sceptical, credulous and super credulous judgment aggregation operators.

Full Text