Abstract

The present practice of Asymptotic Safety in gravity is in conflict with explicit calculations in low energy quantum gravity. This raises the question of whether the present practice meets the Weinberg condition for Asymptotic Safety. I argue, with examples, that the running of $\Lambda$ and $G$ found in Asymptotic Safety are not realized in the real world, with reasons which are relatively simple to understand. A comparison/contrast with quadratic gravity is also given, which suggests a few obstacles that must be overcome before the Lorentzian version of the theory is well behaved. I make a suggestion on how a Lorentzian version of Asymptotic Safety could potentially solve these problems.

Highlights

  • The present practice of Asymptotic Safety in gravity is in conflict with explicit calculations in low energy quantum gravity

  • The logic here is that once all quantum corrections are included in the Euclidean functional integral, the result can be continued to Lorentzian spaces, and the metric and curvatures expanded in the external fields in order to obtain the amplitudes that the Weinberg criterion envisions

  • This series can be ordered by powers of derivatives, such that only the operators with few derivatives are relevant for the low energy limit

Read more

Summary

A Critique of the Asymptotic Safety Program

The present practice of Asymptotic Safety in gravity is in conflict with explicit calculations in low energy quantum gravity. This raises the question of whether the present practice meets the Weinberg condition for Asymptotic Safety. I argue, with examples, that the running of and G found in Asymptotic Safety are not realized in the real world, with reasons which are relatively simple to understand. A comparison/contrast with quadratic gravity is given, which suggests a few obstacles that must be overcome before the Lorentzian version of the theory is well behaved. I make a suggestion on how a Lorentzian version of Asymptotic Safety could potentially solve these problems.

Key Contrasts
FOUNDATIONAL ISSUES
There Is No Gravitational Running of Regular Coupling Constants
Using a Cutoff Does Not Imply the Running of a Coupling Constant
Weinberg Formulation of Asymptotic Safety
The Practice of Asymptotic Safety
Tr δ2Ŵk δgδg
C2 2λ ω R2 3λ θ E λ
THE CASE AGAINST A RUNNING GN AND
Explicit Calculations
The Driving Force of the Tadpole Graph
COMPARISON WITH QUADRATIC GRAVITY
Tachyons and Ghosts
Obstacles to Analytic Continuation
The Graviton Propagator and Lorentzian Asymptotic Safety
OVERALL ASSESSMENT qDn
63. Weinberg
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.