Abstract
Popularity of hollow fiber-supported liquid membranes (HF-SLM) for liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) has increased in the last decades. In particular, HF-SLM are applied for sample treatment in the determination and speciation of metals. Up to the date, optimization of preconcentration systems has been focused on chemical conditions. However, criteria about fiber selection are not reflected in published works. HFs differ in pore size, porosity, wall thickness, etc., which can affect efficiency and/or selectivity of chemical systems in extraction of metals. In this work, Ag+ transport using tri-isobutylphosphine sulfide (TIBPS) has been used as a model to evaluate differences in metal transport due to the properties of three different fibers. Accurel PP 50/280 fibers, with a higher effective surface and smaller wall thickness, showed the highest efficiency for metal transport. Accurel PP Q3/2 exhibited intermediate efficiency but easier handling and, finally, Accurel PP S6/2 fibers, with a higher wall thickness, offered poorer efficiency but the highest stability and capability for metal speciation. Summarizing, selection of the polymeric support of HF-SLM is a key factor in their applicability of LPME for metals in natural waters.
Highlights
During the last years, the use of hollow fiber-supported liquid membranes (HF-SLM) in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) has gained increasing popularity [1,2]
Polypropylene (PP) fibers have been widely applied as a support for metal preconcentration, due to the high compatibility of PP with most of solvents, its relatively low cost, and easy handling [3]
The aim of this work is to offer a critical overview of the effect of fibers characteristics, onto a particular chemical system, applied in HF-LPME
Summary
The use of hollow fiber-supported liquid membranes (HF-SLM) in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) has gained increasing popularity [1,2]. Publications in the field of HF-LPME for trace metals analysis have been increased, and it has become a hot topic due to its efficiency and versatility [1]. Polypropylene (PP) fibers have been widely applied as a support for metal preconcentration, due to the high compatibility of PP with most of solvents, its relatively low cost, and easy handling [3]. The most popular fiber types in trace metals HF-LPME are Accurel PP 50/280 [10,11], Accurel PP Q3/2 [6,9,13], and Accurel PP S6/2 [3] from Membrana® , 3M (Wuppertal, Germany).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
