Abstract

Carotid duplex (CD) scanning is the primary method of evaluating patients suspected of having extracranial carotid occlusive disease. It is incumbent on vascular laboratories (VL) to have internally validated criteria confirming overall accuracy, specificity (SP), sensitivity (SS), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves allow further analysis to update existing criteria. We correlated 127 internal carotid arteries studied by carotid duplex scanning and confirmatory modalities, which showed a SP of 83.3%, SS of 97.9%, NPV of 92.5%, PPV of 95%, and overall accuracy of 94.5% for >50% internal carotid artery stenosis. For >70% stenosis, SP was 88.8%, SS was 96.1%, NPV was 93.6%, PPV was 92.5%, and overall accuracy was 92.9%. ROC curves for the peak systolic velocities were used; for detecting a 50–69% stenosis range a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 93%, NPV of 73%, and PPV of 97% were found. For detecting a 70–99% stenosis a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 90%, NPV of 93%, and a PPV of 93% were found. All vascular laboratories must have a vigorous quality assurance program and must validate their own internal criteria or the recently promulgated consensus criteria for grading the severity of carotid stenosis by carotid duplex examination.

Highlights

  • Over 795,000 people are afflicted by stoke every year in the United States [1] of which 15–20% are due to extracranial large vessel atherosclerosis [2]

  • Imaging of internal carotid artery stenosis is necessary for interventions including surgery and multiple modalities are available, carotid duplex (CD) scanning has become the method of choice [6, 7]

  • Scatter plots were constructed for the peak systolic and end diastolic velocities versus percentage of stenosis based on gold standard angiography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over 795,000 people are afflicted by stoke every year in the United States [1] of which 15–20% are due to extracranial large vessel atherosclerosis [2]. The internal carotid artery is the source of over 75% of the strokes due to extracranial large vessel disease [3]. CD has become the primary method of evaluating patients with symptoms related to the cerebrovascular system and those who are asymptomatic but have risk factors or physical examination findings suggestive of extracranial arterial disease [8]. Contrast angiography has historically been the gold standard to compare with CD, but utilization of this imaging modality has decreased in patients with significant carotid disease due to potential complications and cost; other contrast imaging modalities must be utilized. There has been a gradual shift away from confirming significant disease by CD in patients who are candidates for intervention by contrast arteriography due to potential complications and cost [9]. The validation of the accuracy of CD has become even more critical because of the elimination of the intermediary step of a contrast

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call