Abstract
On the question of punishment two questions are often asked namely, what is the purpose of punishment? And what is the justification for punishment? In answer to these questions, retributive theory states that when crime is committed, the balance of the moral order is upset, but when appropriate punishment is given, the balance of the moral order is put right again and justice is restored. The paper argues that the retributive theory is similar to the golden rule, which states that doing to a person what he has intentionally done to others cannot be unjust. Thus it subscribes to the notion of ‘just desert', (the view that punishment must be deserved) which is an important element of the retributive theory. It however avers that since a good end does not justify an evil means, under no circumstances should an innocent person be punished even if doing so will produce good results. Global Journal of Humanities Vol.3(1&2) 2004: 9-13
Highlights
Summary
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
