Abstract

In 1962, Andreotti and Grauert showed that every $q$-completecomplex space $X$ is cohomologically $q$-complete, that is for every coherent analytic sheaf${\mathcal{F}}$ on $X$, the cohomology group $H^{p}(X, {\mathcal{F}})$ vanishes if $p\geq q$.Since then the question whether the reciprocal statements of these theorems are true have been subject to extensive studies, where more specific assumptions have been added. Until now it is not known if these two conditions are equivalent. Using test cohomology classes, it was shown however that if $X$ is a Stein manifold and, if $D\subset X$ is an open subset which has $C^{2}$ boundary such that $H^{p}(D, {\mathcal{O}}_{D})=0$ for all $p\geq q$, then $D$ is $q$-complete.The aim of the present article is to give a counterexample tothe conjecture posed in $1962$ by Andreotti and Grauert [1]to show that a~cohomologically $q$-complete space is not necessarily $q$-complete.More precisely, we show that there exist for each $n\geq 3$ open subsets$\Omega\subset\mathbb{C}^{n}$ such that for every ${\mathcal{F}}\in coh(\Omega)$,the cohomology groups $H^{p}(\Omega, {\mathcal{F}})$ vanish for all $p\geq n-1$but $\Omega$ is not $(n-1)$-complete.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.