Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the evolution of systemic risk inherent in investment-grade (IG) and high-yield (HY) CDS portfolios and compares the portfolios before and after the global financial crisis. To quantify systemic risk, we propose a novel measure – the expected default rate (EDR), defined by the average default rate of all institutions conditional upon one institution being in default. We implement the EDR under the one-factor copula framework with various dependence structures. We observe that the HY portfolio contains a higher systemic risk than the IG’s, overall, and the gap between the two widens after Lehman Brothers’ default. However, the model discrepancy for IG EDR is higher than that for HY, and for both the IG and HY EDRs, the discrepancies decrease over time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
