Abstract
Objectives Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) provides effective protection against ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and in women at risk for hereditary breast ovarian cancer, but little is known about non-oncologic morbidity after the procedure. We explored mental distress and somatic complaints in women after RRSO compared to controls from the general population. Methods 503 women from hereditary breast ovarian cancer families who had undergone RRSO after genetic counseling received a mailed questionnaire. 361 (71%) responded and 338 (67%) delivered complete data (cases). Controls were five randomly allocated age-matched controls per case ( N = 1690) from the population-based Norwegian Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT-2). Results Mean age of cases and controls was 54.6 years at survey. Mean time since surgery was 5.3 years (median 6.0). Compared to controls, the RRSO group had more palpitations ( p = 0.02), constipation ( p = 0.01), pain and stiffness ( p = 0.02), osteoporosis ( p = 0.02) and musculoskeletal disease ( p = 0.01) even after adjustments for demographic factors including use of hormonal replacement therapy. The RRSO group had lower levels of depression ( p < 0.001) and total mental distress ( p = 0.002) compared to controls. In multivariate linear regression analyses, RRSO was associated with lower levels of depression ( p < 0.001) and total mental distress ( p = 0.002). Conclusions In this controlled observational study, we found more somatic morbidity such as osteoporosis, palpitations, constipation, musculoskeletal disease and pain and stiffness but lower levels of mental distress among women who had undergone RRSO compared to controls.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.