Abstract

Dr. Novack presents a very stimulating and important paper discussing concepts of the analyst’s trust of the patient. Several issues are raised in my discussion, stemming from the difference between a phenomenological experience near analytic approach and a structural approach emphasizing unconscious processes in the analytic relationship. The first issue that I raise involves problems of power that reflect problems in the relationship of asymmetry and mutuality in general, and specifically as we focus on trust in the analytic relationship, which seems to demand an egalitarian relationship between patient and analyst. I discuss trust as involving experiences outside of conscious experience involving implicit relational knowing, the dynamics of projective identification, and the need for the analyst to symbolize—give voice to—the patient’s terrifying belief that she could never have a valued man. I suggest that the difficulty that arose with her patient, Julia, was not a casual mistake but could be seen within the context of a modern Oedipal struggle about being a powerful and successful woman.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.