Abstract
BackgroundQuality assessment of medical images is highly related to the quality assurance, image interpretation and decision making. As to magnetic resonance (MR) images, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is routinely used as a quality indicator, while little knowledge is known of its consistency regarding different observers.MethodsIn total, 192, 88, 76 and 55 brain images are acquired using T2*, T1, T2 and contrast-enhanced T1 (T1C) weighted MR imaging sequences, respectively. To each imaging protocol, the consistency of SNR measurement is verified between and within two observers, and white matter (WM) and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) are alternately used as the tissue region of interest (TOI) for SNR measurement. The procedure is repeated on another day within 30 days. At first, overlapped voxels in TOIs are quantified with Dice index. Then, test-retest reliability is assessed in terms of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). After that, four models (BIQI, BLIINDS-II, BRISQUE and NIQE) primarily used for the quality assessment of natural images are borrowed to predict the quality of MR images. And in the end, the correlation between SNR values and predicted results is analyzed.ResultsTo the same TOI in each MR imaging sequence, less than 6% voxels are overlapped between manual delineations. In the quality estimation of MR images, statistical analysis indicates no significant difference between observers (Wilcoxon rank sum test, pw ≥ 0.11; paired-sample t test, pp ≥ 0.26), and good to very good intra- and inter-observer reliability are found (ICC, picc ≥ 0.74). Furthermore, Pearson correlation coefficient (rp) suggests that SNRwm correlates strongly with BIQI, BLIINDS-II and BRISQUE in T2* (rp ≥ 0.78), BRISQUE and NIQE in T1 (rp ≥ 0.77), BLIINDS-II in T2 (rp ≥ 0.68) and BRISQUE and NIQE in T1C (rp ≥ 0.62) weighted MR images, while SNRcsf correlates strongly with BLIINDS-II in T2* (rp ≥ 0.63) and in T2 (rp ≥ 0.64) weighted MR images.ConclusionsThe consistency of SNR measurement is validated regarding various observers and MR imaging protocols. When SNR measurement performs as the quality indicator of MR images, BRISQUE and BLIINDS-II can be conditionally used for the automated quality estimation of human brain MR images.
Highlights
Quality assessment of medical images is highly related to the quality assurance, image interpretation and decision making
We evaluate the reliability of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurement regarding different observers
This study investigates the SNR consistency regarding different observers
Summary
Quality assessment of medical images is highly related to the quality assurance, image interpretation and decision making. Medical image quality assessment (MIQA) is crucial in the equipment quality assurance [6,7,8], comparison of algorithms for image restoration [9,10,11,12,13], image interpretation [14,15,16,17] and disease diagnosis [18, 19]. These MIQA algorithms can be grouped into the full- and noreference categories [19,20,21,22,23]. No-reference MIQA algorithms are more useful and challenging, and no reference information can be borrowed [20, 23, 26]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
