Abstract

Abstract Cation‐exchange capacity (CEC) of 30 Alabama soils was estimated by two different methods based or routine soil‐test results consisting of soil‐water pH, Adams‐Evans buffer pH, and Mehlich‐1 extractable cations (K, Mg, and Ca), which were obtained automatically by a computerized data acquisition system. In one method, CEC was calculated by solving a quadratic equation involving soil‐water and buffer pH's; in the other, CEC was estimated as the summation of extractable cations and exchangeable acidity. The two estimated CEC's agreed well with each other and also had the same magnitude as CEC determined by the normal NaOAc, pH 8.2 method. By averaging the two calculated values, an even closer estimation of the measured CEC was found. These calculations and comparisons can be accomplished quickly and efficiently by a minicomputer via a simple FORTRAN program. In addition, a discrepancy between the two estimated CEC's would indicate possible errors in analytical determinations and/or the inadequacy o...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call